The Brief

A federal judge blocked Trump's mail-ballot rule again

The order would have let the Postal Service build a list of eligible voters and refuse ballots from anyone not on it. Twenty-three states are suing. Both times a court has stopped it, the reason has been the calendar.
Aug 31, 2026 · Politics

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's mail-ballot rule on Thursday. It is the second time a court has stopped it, and the first mail ballots for the midterms are about a week out.

Judge Indira Talwani issued a fourteen-day temporary restraining order against enforcement of the Postal Service's newly finalized rule, Fox News reported. A hearing is set for September 3.

Caroline Brehman / CQ-Roll Call, Inc. · source · CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images, editorial use

That is where it stands. Here is how it got there.

Trump signed the executive order in March 2026. It directed the Postal Service to build a system regulating who could vote by mail, and directed states to create eligibility lists, according to Votebeat.

Section 3 of the order went further. It directed the Postal Service to create a list of eligible voters and to refuse ballots from voters who were not on it. The American Civil Liberties Union sets out that provision in its account of the separate challenge brought by the League of Women Voters coalition.

Courts blocked the order once already. The Supreme Court then found that challenge premature, on the grounds that the administration had not yet implemented the directive, and struck down one of the holds. Talwani removed the other herself.

The Postal Service then finalized its rule. It requires barcodes on mail ballots, obliges states to submit voter information through a Postal Service data portal, and calls for citizen verification data. Plaintiffs challenged it again, and Thursday's order is the result.

Twenty-three states and Washington, D.C. are suing, alongside voting-rights groups including the League of Women Voters. New York Attorney General Letitia James is a named plaintiff.

Talwani's reasoning has been the same both times, and it is not about whether the rule is lawful. It is about the clock. Votebeat quotes her finding fewer than ninety days remaining before the midterms, with states given neither the time nor the funds to design new mail ballots.

The rule has not been struck down. It has been run out of runway, twice.

By the numbers

The reporting

This story is built on reporting by Fox News. Read the original →

Sources

Image credits

We do our best to source photographs that accurately reflect each story, but we are a small team. Some images are illustrative rather than photographs of the specific event described. Every source is listed above.

Citations

  1. Fox News
  2. Votebeat
  3. Votebeat
  4. Fox News
PreviousGuards at this Texas detention camp dialed 911 more than 160 timesNextA flash flood tore through the bottom of the Grand Canyon